CINC vs REDX
Both CINC and REDX compete in Lead Generation for real estate agents. Here's how they stack up on pricing, features, and value.
Our verdict
Both are solid choices for real estate agents. Overall we give the edge to REDX — agents who prospect by phone every day. That said, CINC is worth a look if high-volume teams wanting leads plus ai nurture.
Side-by-side comparison
| CINC | REDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 | 4.2 |
| Pricing | Paid · Custom pricing | Paid · From ~$60/mo per lead type |
| Best for | High-volume teams wanting leads plus AI nurture. | Agents who prospect by phone every day. |
| Key features |
|
|
| Try it | Visit CINC | Visit REDX |
CINC
CINC (Commissions Inc) generates buyer and seller leads through targeted ads and hyper-local IDX sites, then works them with AI-assisted follow-up (Alex, its AI). It's aimed at teams that want a high volume of leads with automation to nurture them.
Full CINC review →REDX
REDX supplies prospecting leads — expired listings, FSBOs, for-rent-by-owner, and pre-foreclosures — with phone numbers, plus a Power Dialer and objection scripts. It's a staple for agents who build their business on outbound calling.
Full REDX review →